Picture
image found at espn.go.com
By Eddie Middlebrook and Dan Allsup

What can we possibly tell the public that they already don’t know?

This is the question that ran a marathon through my mind as I sat on a cold, metal fold-out chair across from another empty chair of the same ilk in a hypothetical climate-controlled room. I carefully look over my mundane interview questions when suddenly, apathy began to set in. What new knowledge could this interview bring to the surface? Why discuss something that has been discussed at length countless times before? Why am I talking out loud to myself in an empty room? Am I crazy?


Before I could definitively answer that last question, in walks a tall, slender man with a patchy red beard. He sports a retro Rolling Stones shirt with wrinkled khaki shorts and Passan flip-flops. Instantly, I feel over dressed as I was under the assumption that we would conduct this interview in business casual attire, but I notice that this Dan character isn’t fazed by the wardrobe miscommunication and sits in the chair across from me. We exchanged pleasantries and then I proceed with the interview.

Why trade Elvis now?

Dan: Elvis? I thought we were going to talk about RG3?

Elvis represents a lot of things for the Rangers: Gold Glove Shortstop, young superstar, top of the order threat and of course a smile that makes Tom Verducci blush. He's a very valuable commodity, and he also represents an enormous trade chip that the Rangers could throw onto the table. The only reason Elvis is expendable this early is because of younger, cheaper and possibly better option at shortstop - Jurickson Profar.

The Rangers' insistence of keeping Ian Kinsler at 2B - either block Profar for two years in AAA, or paves the road towards a cataclysmic event known as Trade Elvis Andrus.

This is where fans get upset and/or emotional.

Dear fans, please don't confuse trading Elvis with thinking he's no good. In fact it’s the exact opposite. Elvis is so good the Rangers should maximize his value, and with Profar hanging around, his max value is definitely a trade.

People who know stuff about baseball, numbers and projections (Fangraphs'- Dan Szymborski) actually project Profar to exceed Andrus in WAR next year: 3.2 to 3.0. This information lends me to think that Texas would incur a major loss if Profar replaced Andrus in 2013.

I had a feeling Dan would give long-winded answers, so thankfully I brought my recorder to this parley. Dan was able to ramble off this response all the while he was staring long into the painting of a snowy-white feline playing with a ball of pink yarn.

I crossed my legs, tapped my Bic pen on my legal pad, and hung on his every word.

So Dan, what kind of package would you expect the Rangers to receive for Elvis?

Dan: There are many factors: First you have to find a desperate team (see: Shuerholtz, Braves). Teams become very desperate at the trade deadline and when injuries arise. Right now, teams are getting close to Spring Training, which means eternal optimism, until reality puts them in last place. That's why I don't think Andrus has been moved yet, because the right team isn't desperate yet. While I don't think it's practical to trade a superstar of Andrus’ caliber mid-season, it could happen, depending on who’s desperate, and what they have.

I think a return for Elvis could actually be similar to the famed "Teixeira Trade", and by that I mean wild value. Recent history suggests prospects' value is being lowered (more reason to trade Elvis, not Profar). I think a return could be in the neighborhood of four to five guys with the top two guys being centerpieces. Yes, double-centerpieces, I said it.

The double-center pieces could be top echelon prospects (overall top 30-40) or one young major league guy, and another top prospect.

Then add another three valuable/meaningful pieces. As for who the double-centerpieces could be:

Dodgers- Yasiel Puig, Zach Lee
Cardinals- Oscar Taveras, Shelby Miller (St. Louis has numerous options, very strong system)
Red Sox- Xander Bogearts, Jackie Bradley, Jr.
Tigers- Rick Porcello, Nick Castellaons
Reds- Devin Mesoraco, Billy Hamilton  

Those teams seem like the best fits. Fans of those opposing teams probably aren't thrilled about giving up those guys, but you have to look at the market. One year of RA Dickey, (plus a negotiating window), netted double centerpieces (Travis D'Arnaud, Noah Syndergaard).

Dan’s idea of double centerpieces make me instantly think of an over-the-top dinner setting, but I shake the thought and return to his point. The idea of getting a “Teixeira-type” trade has my mind riding a unicorn on a colorful rainbow akin to some acid trip from the 60s.

Final question Dan: What is the likelihood of Elvis not playing in Arlington this season?

Dan: I say Elvis will play in Arlington this year.  I think the earliest a deal gets done would be the trade deadline this year. JD has been playing the Elvis trade card, completely opposite of how Arizona has been dealing with Upton, because a vetoed deal only makes matters worse. The Rangers seem to let guys play out their deals (CJ Wilson, Josh Hamilton) being the most recent examples. However if the Rangers had an ample replacement (Profar) waiting in the wings to replace Hamilton last winter, it makes me wonder what would've happened.

I believe Texas is definitely getting calls on Elvis beyond Arizona wanting to get rid of Upton. However, as close as the Rangers play it to the vest, a deal tomorrow with the Dodgers would not surprise me in the least.

Eddie, thanks for your time, thanks for being dressed, but mostly thanks for understanding the Elvis Andrus Trade Manifesto.

And with that, Dan disappears into the dark abyss known as the hallway, never to be seen again.

***Beep, beep, beep*** I hit my alarm, rub the sleep from my eyes and begrudgingly climb out of bed. 



Eddie Middlebrook is the co-host of “Chin Music” and Junior Staff Writer for ShutDowninning. He can be reached at Eddie.Middlebrook@ShutDowninning.com or on Twitter @emiddlebrook.

Dan Allsup is a staff writer for Shutdown Inning. You can reach him on Twitter @DanAllsup.
 


Comments

01/14/2013 13:30

"Passan flip flops" is my favorite line I have read in a long time.

Reply
Eddie
01/14/2013 15:18

I'm so glad somebody caught that reference!

Reply
Brenda Johnson
01/14/2013 17:40

Oh, my, had me going there for a bit...dreams aren't all nightmares.

Reply
Jeff
01/14/2013 21:27

Great stuff guys. I don't like the situation you predicted, but a very good read and interesting. I can maybe see that happening if the rangers tank and are sellers in July.

Reply
James
01/25/2013 16:31

I'm a Cards fan and a Rangers fan...that said, Oscar Taveras is not going to be put in a trade for for Elvis or anyone else in the near future. He's going to be the centerpiece of only one thing and that the Cards' lineup in the coming years.

I do believe the Cards would include Miller in a deal for Elvis though. What the other pieces might be is anyone's guess.

Good blog.

Reply
flint
01/25/2013 16:48

zips has Andrus worth 3.1 war in 2013; Taveras is worth 2.6 war in 2013. Andrus has two years of control left at $12 million; Taveras has about 6.75 years left.

Even if you don't like these projections for minor leaguers, I think the Rangers would have to add a piece along with Andrus to get Taveras.

Reply
james
01/25/2013 18:02

It's hard to transfer minor league past stats towards what that particular player will do in the majors. Your point of years of control is very well taken. With Beltran in all likelihood gone after 2013, Taveras is the replacement for him in waiting. I just can't see the Cards letting him go for Elvis, be it Andrus or Presley.

Dan
01/25/2013 18:17

I agree Taveras is the best prospect on that list, and a deal with him would probably have to be expanded to compensate for that.

(St. Louis has numerous options..) I said that because STL could get Elvis without moving Taveras/Miller. Lots of options, I just listed the best two.

Glad you like the blog!

Reply
Dave
01/25/2013 16:42

There's a 0% chance that Bogaerts and Bradley, let alone Taveras and Miller, would be packaged for Elvis Andrus.

Reply
Dan
01/25/2013 18:21

Bogearts wouldn't have a position if Elvis was a Red Sox, quite likely he would be included (only 23 games above A ball).

Reply
Dave
01/25/2013 18:45

He quite certainly would not be included, because there is no way Bogaerts is going in a trade for Andrus unless it is straight up. I don't think the Rangers make that move, and I'm pretty sure the Red Sox wouldn't either.

Braves Fan
01/25/2013 17:20

uhhh why are the Braves desperate? If you're referring to the Tez trade pretty sure they made a bad deal but were trying to win it all so not desperate. If not I dont know what the heck you are talking about because the Braves just made a great deal, have been since Wren took office and are a legit team

Reply
Dan
01/25/2013 18:10

Yes- I was referencing the Tex-Trade. Shuerholtz was retiring soon when he made the Tex trade- therefore he didn't really care if he got burned by the 5 guys he gave up for Tex. I see your point how that's not necessarily desperate, but what I'm alluding to is- its best to trade w/ a GM who doesn't have much stock in the future (Jack Z?).

Reply
K Dean
01/25/2013 17:39

As a Tiger fan, I would be more than happy to give you Rick Porcello and Nick Castellanos for Elvis!

Reply
Dan
01/25/2013 18:22

Yeah- DET doesn't have much to offer compared to the other teams.

Reply
pete
01/25/2013 18:10

Taveras aint goin nowhere. Miller, maybe, but you wouldn't get much more than that from the Cardinals. Maybe -- and I said maybe -- Miller and Matt Adams.

Reply
Matt
01/25/2013 18:27

Taillon and Gregory Polanco from the Pirates do it?

Reply
Dan
01/25/2013 18:50

Pirates have the pieces to get Elvis, and he'd be cheap for the next two years, would be interesting.

Reply
David Texifornia
01/25/2013 21:54

Since prior comments have mentioned just about everyone else, as a RANGER and DODGER fan, I’ll take the LA side of the suggestion. I love Elvis but the DODGERS are kidding themselves if they think Hanley Ramirez can project at SS in the years ahead. A perfect arrangement would be to send Ramirez back to 3B , trade for Elvis and everybody’s happy for years to come. As for the price, ZACH LEE (LSU QB, when/if baseball fails him) is iffy, but YASIEL PUIG is the real deal. The Dodgers have other pieces also. So I like the matchup with the Dodgers. One piece left out of the reasoning is also that Elvis is a Scott Boras client. He will push Elvis to test the market and while that might be good business for Elvis, it’s going to drive the price up even higher to keep him. PROFAR is real. If Elvis will resign before becoming a FA, then great. If not, the world will should begin to learn all about J-Pro.

Reply
steve
01/25/2013 23:30

Reds fan here. I would seriously doubt the Reds trade for Andrus. They have a 2nd year SS they like in Cozart. Last year they had TWO other SS options that they valued high - one traded for Choo and the other converted to CF. So, if Cozart doesn't pan out to be average/better than average (unlikely), they could always put Hamilton back in there at SS instead of CF. Andrus would be an upgrade of course, but I don't see the Reds wanting to make this move.

Reply
Joe
01/25/2013 23:53

Is there any team anywhere in baseball that is going to offer an elite, five-star pitching prospect like Shelby Miller in any trade.? Not likely, except for maybe the Cardinals, and then, only because they have other promising pitching talent. If Texas can get Miller for either Andrus or Profar even up, they ought to do the deal immediately before the St. Louis changes their mind.

Reply
range13
01/27/2013 06:30

I'm a Cards fan and I'll give you Miller for Profar and you don't have to worry about me changing my mind. I'd give up matt Adams for a pitcher because you need a 1B.

Eric
01/26/2013 01:40

How about a deal with the tigers straight up for max scherzer...?

Reply
kyle
01/26/2013 01:49

Obviously we have a standard case of STL fans over valuing their prospects. Look what the Royals gave up for Shields. Andrus is a young superstar and PROVEN at the major league level. For every deal they made with ATL there are prospect deals like the Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, etc. where top prospects don't pan out. Any deal involving Andrus would start with a top prospect and then include 2 or 3 more. They don't need to trade him so would have to be blown away.

Reply
range13
01/27/2013 07:22

First, there is a variety of reasons that the Cardinals and Royals don't belong in the same sentence (11 WS rings, KC 1, TX 0). The Cardinals farm system is ranked #1 in baseball but I I love how the Ranger fans don't like any of the Card's prospects and think their over ratted but I'm sure Profar is on his way to the HOF. I would love to see Elvis or Profar at SS for the Cards but teams don't give up 3 of their top 5 prospects for two years of anyone. I think there are multiple reasons that the Rangers could trade Elvis and more might be on the way. The top prospect is waiting for Elvis to get out of his way, team did not sign Kinsler (who should hit behind elvis, in the 2 hole) to the best deal and the Rangers might to do a little rebuilding after losing FA and not replacing them, I'll be surprised if the Rangers are in the playoffs this year but I'll be happy to take a discount on Elvis at the trade deadline if the Rangers are out of it.

Reply
Dirk
01/26/2013 14:47

As a Rangers fan, I don't like any of the potential trade suitors, aside from the Cardinals (Taveras) and I simply don't think we'd get that guy from STL.

That said, I'd still hope that Texas either A) finds a trade partner for Ian Kinsler, freeing up 2B for Profar or B) moves Ian Kinsler to 1B/OF. I just don't think the Rangers are in a full-blown rebuild mode and as such, trading to hoard more prospects just doesn't make all that much sense to me. It also doesn't make sense to me to add the major league players you've listed as Texas is not in need of another #3-5 starter considering they've already got 4 of their 5 rotation guys locked up for quite some time.

Reply



Leave a Reply