Picture
image found at stamfordadvocate.com
By Bob Bland 


“There was a relationship over time.” - Jon Daniels, after Josh Hamilton signed with the Los Angeles Angels

“There's no relationship there.” - Michael Young, after being traded to the Philadelphia Phillies

Ranger fans love their team’s front office, and rightfully so.  Jon Daniels, Nolan Ryan and their entire staff have done excellent work building a championship contender for a franchise that had spent most of the previous four decades as one of the least competitive in pro sports.


Yes, many are quite anxious (and even panicky, in some cases) about what has transpired with the Rangers this offseason, as one target after another ends up somewhere else.  But Ranger fans should not be concerned at all about the competency of their front office.  What perhaps should be somewhat concerning, however, is the perception of the Ranger front office among the rest of baseball...and even their own clubhouse.

It’s not unusual for departing players to feel some level of animosity toward their former team.  But when there’s enough bitterness for it to be readily apparent to all the second they leave town, that is a bit alarming.

Michael Young didn’t wait until Festivus to air his grievances with his former employers, hastily calling an impromptu press conference during which he made it a point to call out the Ranger front office: "I can't say there's a relationship there or a good relationship there. Well, no there's no relationship there, but that's fine with me," he said.

Unlike Young, Josh Hamilton didn’t come right out and verbally blast the Ranger front office, but the way he signed with his former team’s arch rival without even having one final conversation with the Rangers was a pretty clear indication of his disdain for the front office.  Hamilton’s agent claims they never agreed to give the Rangers one last chance to match any offer, but refusing the courtesy of one last discussion seems willfully spiteful - especially considering what a huge chance that front office took on him back when very few in baseball were willing to touch him with a 10-foot pole.

Could there be others still currently in the Rangers clubhouse who share Young and Hamilton’s unfavorable view of the front office?  It’s possible, but even if there aren’t, the bigger concern might be how players throughout the majors look at the Ranger front office.  The most commonly cited factors for free agents choosing not to come to Arlington (other than simply being offered more money to play elsewhere) are the excessive heat and the dimensions of The Ballpark.  Nobody’s really ever included the front office when listing those factors.

But as is the case in all sports, baseball is very much a word-of-mouth game among its players.  If a guy has an unpleasant experience with one team, he’s almost certain to let his new teammates know about it, as well as friends on other teams.  Heck, it could even be what you see a runner at first shooting the bull about with the opposing first baseman.


There’s certainly no evidence whatsoever that free agents are avoiding the Rangers because they’ve heard bad things about their front office from current or former players, but it might be wise for Jon Daniels and Nolan Ryan to more carefully cultivate their relationships with those in the clubhouse.  There’s already enough to overcome in trying to convince free agents Arlington is the place they should be, so adding any more potential negatives would not be conducive to improving their target acquisition success rate.





Bob Bland is a Staff Writer for ShutDownInning. He can be reached at Bob.Bland@ShutDownInning.com or on Twitter @SDIBob.
 


Comments

Gary
12/19/2012 13:15

Young has hated the front office for several years now, since he felt he was being "moved out", which of course he was...because he was terrible on defense and we had young players ready to go (both of whom have shown to be far superior to Young).
Hamilton was likely given a "take it or leave it" ultimatum by the Angels. There had been very little talk of Texas going to 5 years for him and none at $25M that I had seen. His opinion seems to be that the Rangers got first shot. I'm glad they exercised some fiscal responsibility. Jumping out to 5 yrs and $125M would have been far too rich for my taste. The Angels likely put that on the table and said "we don't want to get into a public bidding war, this is our offer. We'd like you to accept it, but if you take it back to Texas with an offer to match, we'll have to pull it off the table.". Then there is the "Josh is Josh" argument. I honestly think the clubhouse is better off with a bunch of young guys that don't know much other than to just play hard through ups and downs. You think if we go through a rough stretch (which we went through even in the 2 WS years) that Young would just sit on the bench and not question anything? I know he was our "leader" but he was here a LONG time and what exactly did he "lead" us to? These moves had to be made. The only move this offseason that has upset (probably too harsh) me is not getting Greinke. The Dodgers overpaid for him, but I thought he would have really given us possibly the best rotation in baseball.

Reply
Gary
12/19/2012 13:18

the "festivus" line was funny though...I'll give you that.

Reply
Robert Pike
12/19/2012 18:23

Remember the first words out of Josh's mouth after the Sherlocks incident? He "wished he was announcing a contract extension."

And then the Rangers stopped talking extension.

If he was irritated by the way they handled that (and by "handled that," I mean every possible way you could take that), then that's kind of his problem and not the front office's.

For as "professional" as Michael Young is, he doesn't understand the business side of baseball.

You can either overpay players and allow yourself to be pressured into things like keeping Michael Young at third even though you know its bad for the team, or you can ruffle the feathers of a few players through the years. It's tough to find that happy medium.

Reply



Leave a Reply